I've been reading through Mark and I recently read through Mark 14 which records the account of Judas of Iscariot agreeing to betray Jesus. In the Life Application Bible I own and use for devotions (I'm thankful to my parents who gave me this bible for Christmas. It's been in 5 different countries numerous states and provinces and God has revealed himself to me and drawn me closer to me many times through this Bible) the commentary on Judas is primarily negative. Probably the most positive thing I've read is that Judas thought he was helping Jesus out in order to bring about a political reign (depending on one's theology one might agree that Judas was "helping" Jesus out").
As I read this commentary, I reflected on the information we have available about Judas and it baffled me that Jesus would choose him to be one of his Apostles, one of those in his "inner circle" of followers. I racked my brain over why Jesus would choose Judas, knowing he would betray him. If Jesus emptied himself of, or limited, his divine rights to omniscience or "foreknowledge" then perhaps he was not aware that Judas would betray him. By the time of the Last Supper though, it appears Jesus is aware that someone will betray him.
When we read about all the other disciples there always seems to be some quality about them that despite their failures they have attributes that we can appreciate. When I thought about this in regards to Judas I could not come up with a single attribute. In frustration, I finally said to God, "why did you choose him?!", "What did you see in him?!" Shortly after asking this what happened after the betrayal came to mind. I remembered Judas being so grieved that he had betrayed Jesus that he went out and hung himself and that he only did that after trying to undo what he had done. When I thought of this I realized that Judas betrayed Jesus publicly, and he was the only one who stood up for him when in the darkest hour. Peter swore to follow Jesus even to death. He cut off a soldiers ear in the garden when he was surrounded by the J-Crew, then denied Jesus three times while Jesus was on trial. After Jesus' resurrection Peter did eventually die for Jesus. We know that John and Mary were at the cross, but we know of no action they took to stop the crucifixion (perhaps they caught on).
Amongst all the followers and the disciples, Judas was the only one who went to the Priests and tried to stop the ball that he had started rolling. In the darkest hour, when everyone was against Jesus, Judas was the only one to stand up for Jesus. I do not want to minimize what Judas did, Jesus considered it so serious that he said on the Day of Judgment it would have been better that he had never been born.
Luther once said something to the effect of : If you remove the promise of heaven and the threat of hell, the way people act is who they really are (if someone knows the actual quote I'd appreciate having that). In the darkest hour, with nothing to gain, we see the redeeming quality of Judas. We see possibly what Jesus saw in him.
TSB VIII
9 months ago
6 comments:
To me the completer lack of redeeming qualities is the beauty of Jesus choosing Judas. Same thing with several of the "name only" disciples we don't really know much about (biblically at least). To m,e once I can justify why Jesus chose them I have to be able to justify why he chose me, or more dangerous yet - why he chooses others.
Great point AJ!!!
Kinda causes me to step back and appreciate grace. I'm still tryin to figure out why he "choose me".
Perhaps, I should look at this as no matter what evil act we have committed, God can still reach us. I'd like to believe Judas' reaction to what he had done going to the Priests) has brought about by the conviction of the Holy Spirit (although some may argue the Spirit was not active until after the ascension). However, I don't think the hanging himself was something God told him to do.
I also see the redeeming quality not something in and of the person, but a work that God births and produces in the person. Like salvation, it's ours to own, but not our work, or of our own self.
P.S. Glad to know you're reading my blog.
"OH JUDAS" was one of your grandmother's expressions.
But I don't think she had a theological basis or argument when she used it :)
Good to know I'm keeping w/ tradition.
Hey Dave,
Good thoughts, as usual. And I appreciate AJ's theological take and reminder of grace.
I think Judas' qualities can be seen in his downfall, just like many of our strengths can become great weapons for evil. (As C.S. Lewis once said (something like), "Good mice don't become bad archangels. Good archangels become bad archangels.") As Judas was able to position political and religious individuals we see he was wise, as a serpent. Leading a politically charged movement required Jesus to surround himself with politically astute individuals. I think his realpolitik could have been used to great good and probably was in developing Jesus' following. He was, in addition, the treasurer.
AP: Always able to find the political side ;)
I'm not sure how politically astute the fishermen were. I can definitely see how Matthew & Judas would be.
Post a Comment